tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5071813.post6327081866530013302..comments2024-03-25T02:16:16.247-07:00Comments on Christ the Tao: Vampires vs. Nazis: Umair Haque and the Racism of Anti-RacismUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger25125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5071813.post-20396475854452283922021-07-07T15:12:18.306-07:002021-07-07T15:12:18.306-07:00Hello:
I am a non-white and agnostic and my take ...Hello:<br /><br />I am a non-white and agnostic and my take about the racism is that,from a Redpill/Blackpill perspective:<br /><br />The non-whites who are Leftists and are the most fanatical about it is because of SELF-HATRED<br /><br />And a self-hatred that has no basis: since they are NOT responsible.<br /><br />1. It is because of the GOLDEN RATIO regarding beauty(Law of Facial Symmetry) and COLORISM.<br /><br />2. We know BEAUTY is OBJECTIVE, and if a face corresponds to the Golden Ratio( ask any Plastic Surgeon),then it is beautiful.<br /><br />The caucasoids have the greatest proportion of faces that correspond to the Golden Ratio,which say Chines,Blacks, Amerindians,do not much.<br /><br />3. Those Leftist non-whites subconsciously HATE their faces,so they lash out against whites. We know 95% of our decisions are influenced by our SUBCONSCIOUS.<br /><br />4. The redpill/blackpill says: you did NOT chose your race and face,it is NOT your fault, so there is NO pt in fooling yourself and believing nonsense like systemic racism, white fragility and critical race theory to justify evil actions against white because of your self-hatred.minoriahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08030653596590889158noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5071813.post-72727765799359992822021-06-06T14:18:34.111-07:002021-06-06T14:18:34.111-07:00Dear frienf, more about infanticide : The War Agai...Dear frienf, more about infanticide : The War Against Girls https://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303657404576361691165631366.html?reflink=desktopwebshare_twitter a través de @WSJ alfonsohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13598403498444747483noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5071813.post-38851611704257093202021-04-04T07:44:52.919-07:002021-04-04T07:44:52.919-07:00Thanks, Alfonso. One can generally assume that th...Thanks, Alfonso. One can generally assume that the Left-wing Media is lying about everything, until proven to the contrary. (Interesting, I came across a letter from C. S. Lewis saying the same thing about the Media in his era.)<br /><br />The claim that Joe Biden is a "Christian," seems far-fetched in the extreme. Maybe in the same sense that Donald Trump is a "Christian," that is, identifying as such is seen as good for one's political career. David B Marshallhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04029133398946303654noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5071813.post-89156501699583106082021-04-04T05:58:53.729-07:002021-04-04T05:58:53.729-07:00"CBS report claimed that “more than 140 women..."CBS report claimed that “more than 140 women have been charged under El Salvador's total ban on abortion since 1998, incarcerated for up to 35 years in some of the world's most notorious prisons. Many say they never had an abortion, but instead claim that after suffering a miscarriage they were wrongfully convicted when their doctors accused them of intentionally terminating their pregnancies.” According to VIDA SV, the trial documents in Hernández’ case indicate that her child died when he was discarded in a latrine shortly after his birth. At trial, Hernández claimed she did not know she was pregnant until she miscarried in the latrine. Prosecutors presented evidence that she discarded her child while he was alive, and argued that evidence indicated she’d done so knowingly. A jury agreed with the prosecution.<br /><br />Sara Larín, president of the Fundación VIDA SV, and Ligia Castaldi, a professor at the Ave Maria School of Law in Naples, Florida, published this year in the International Human Rights Review an exhaustive legal investigation of 25 cases, which explains in detail "the fraud involved in the Hernández case before the Inter-American Court" and the other cases. <br /><br />Speaking June 3 to ACI Prensa, CNA’s Spanish language news partner, Larín said that the Center for Reproductive Rights had "sent an intimidating letter” requesting Hernández’ name be redacted from that investigation, “alleging that it is necessary to protect the privacy of the relatives of the alleged victim." <br /><br />Larín pointed out that "CBS News itself and a documentary made by the Center for Reproductive Rights show the faces of family members and the family's living conditions to emotionally manipulate public opinion in favor of this case." <br /><br />Larín further noted that Hernández "was not a victim, but a victimizer," given her conviction for aggravated homicide. <br /><br />"The sentence is public precisely because the right to privacy is reserved to the victims and not to the victimizers," Larín stressed.<br /><br />"She never disputed her guilt, did not file any appeal for review, and gave conflicting versions of the facts. The evidence shows that she committed the crime and those false versions were never found reasonable by the Court. It’s not true that she didn’t know that she was pregnant, she had already had three children previously,” Larin explained. <br /><br />In her testimony, “Maria Edis said that she had fallen into the river, that she had inadvertently expelled the child in the latrine, which according to forensic doctors was not possible; there was no evidence of any injuries from the alleged fall into the river. It was determined that the child was born alive, breathing, and survived between 10 and 20 minutes after being thrown into the latrine," Larín said.<br /><br />The court’s sentence said that Hernández’ statements were "contrary to logic and medicine," and concluded that she deliberately caused the baby's death. De Cardenal emphasized that in El Salvador miscarriage is not punishable, and that "this farce is so absurd because women are not even imprisoned for induced abortion."<br /><br />"Why? Because the penalty for induced abortion is 2 to 8 years (not 40) and the judges don’t hate or persecute the women, instead they give them alternative sentencing, " she explained. Editor's note: This story was first published by ACI Prensa, CNA's Spanish-language news partner. It has been translated and adapted by Catholic News Agency and is reprinted with permission.El Salvador pro-life groups decry 'misleading' CBS report amid abortion fight https://pregnancyhelpnews.com/el-salvador-pro-life-groups-decry-misleading-cbs-report-amid-abortion-fight a través de @phc_news alfonsohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13598403498444747483noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5071813.post-14741186496104169062021-04-03T22:57:18.044-07:002021-04-03T22:57:18.044-07:00Yes, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris Are Planning to L...Yes, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris Are Planning to Legalize Abortion Up To Birth - https://go.shr.lc/39IRgca via @Shareaholic alfonsohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13598403498444747483noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5071813.post-42761857073423587052021-04-03T22:53:02.897-07:002021-04-03T22:53:02.897-07:00NPR says El Salvador mom was charged for ‘having a...NPR says El Salvador mom was charged for ‘having an abortion’ - but evidence shows she murdered her newborn | News | LifeSite https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/npr-says-el-salvador-mom-was-charged-for-having-an-abortion-but-evidence-sh New York Times Finally Issues Correction on Abortion El Salvador Story | News | LifeSite https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/new-york-times-finally-issues-correction-on-abortion-el-salvador-story alfonsohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13598403498444747483noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5071813.post-15355741100156923722021-04-03T22:50:49.985-07:002021-04-03T22:50:49.985-07:00David B Marshal & Arkenaten; Dear friends, I w...David B Marshal & Arkenaten; Dear friends, I wish to clarify the lies about El Salvador's abortion laws among people who do not speak Spanish and are unable to read the Salvadoran press; There is a lot of misinformation on this issue: it is falsely said that a woman can be prosecuted or imprisoned for spontaneous abortion, it is also a lie that there are women sentenced to 30 years for having an abortion; de facto no woman is incarcerated for abortion in El Salvador. Dear friends, I wish to clarify the lies about El Salvador's abortion laws among people who do not speak Spanish and are unable to read the Salvadoran press; There is a lot of misinformation on this issue: it is falsely said that a woman can be prosecuted or imprisoned for spontaneous abortion, it is also a lie that there are women sentenced to 30 years for aborting; de facto no woman is incarcerated for abortion in El Salvador. The 17+ Women in El Salvador: A Case of Infanticide Impunity in the Name of Abortion Rights BY LIGIA DE JESUS CASTALDI<br />American pro-abortion supporters, Western embassies and international human-rights bodies have taken part in the war against El Salvador’s full ban on elective abortion by supporting a fraudulent campaign that promotes impunity for infanticide in that country. The 17+ Women in El Salvador: A Case of Infanticide Impunity in the Name of Abortion Rights https://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2020/02/59850/ via @PublicDiscourse alfonsohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13598403498444747483noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5071813.post-78942940372389711342021-03-03T00:29:10.142-08:002021-03-03T00:29:10.142-08:00Why should I comment about abortion? Why should yo...<i>Why should I comment about abortion? Why should you care what I think about the matter</i><br />You cited it as one of the key policies of the Democratic Party - ''abortion on demand''<br />I asked you what alternative, if any , - ''as opposed to what?''<br /><br />And this is why I linked the El Salvador article to demonstrate what a total ban might look like if adopted by another country.<br /><br />Biden is a Christian and he does not seem to be exhibiting any suggestion that he is gong to implement stricter abortion laws. <br />As you are also a Christian why do you object to his stance? <br /><br />Or are you more inclined to agree with El Salvador's approach, at least in banning all forms of abortion? <br /><br />Arkenatenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01166167852846589879noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5071813.post-1481012642469902122021-03-02T20:57:23.635-08:002021-03-02T20:57:23.635-08:00Why should I comment about abortion? Why should y...Why should I comment about abortion? Why should you care what I think about the matter? David B Marshallhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04029133398946303654noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5071813.post-84859033951301305282021-03-02T09:13:00.351-08:002021-03-02T09:13:00.351-08:00By the way, I left an updated comment on the Resur...By the way, I left an updated comment on the Resurrection post, re the lines of evidence. Maybe you missed it?Arkenatenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01166167852846589879noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5071813.post-51052518229111949472021-03-02T09:08:47.395-08:002021-03-02T09:08:47.395-08:00The last sentence of that article strikes me as Ha...<i>The last sentence of that article strikes me as Handmaid's Tale sensationalism:</i><br />I agree. Nevertheless the draconian legislation over this issue is certainly an eyebrow raiser.<br /> I note you still did not address my question regarding abortion. You're not avoiding it, are you? Arkenatenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01166167852846589879noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5071813.post-42852453566847555412021-03-02T07:04:53.819-08:002021-03-02T07:04:53.819-08:00Central America is a mess, generally. The last sen...Central America is a mess, generally. The last sentence of that article strikes me as Handmaid's Tale sensationalism: no woman in the US is likely to ever be locked up for 35 years for having an abortion. <br /><br />The evil in America, realized not feared, is tens of millions of kids being raised without a Dad, sometimes a Mom, due to irresponsibility on the parents' fault. That leads to lots of people in jail, too, and lots dead. Central America isn't lacking in those kinds of problems either, I don't think. David B Marshallhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04029133398946303654noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5071813.post-71394012252741790202021-03-02T05:55:38.281-08:002021-03-02T05:55:38.281-08:00As you didn't get round to answering the quest...As you didn't get round to answering the question regarding abortion, yet; I understand you are probably busy with your book, this might interest you.<br /><br />https://www.cbsnews.com/news/miscarriages-abortion-jail-el-salvador/<br /><br />Here's a excerpt from the post.<br /><br /><i>Seven months pregnant, Manuela, a mother of two, said she miscarried at her modest home in rural El Salvador. But the police, and a judge, didn't believe her. They charged and convicted her for aggravated homicide, sentencing her to 30 years in prison.<br /><br />But Manuela only served two of those years. In 2010, she died alone in a hospital of Hodgkin's lymphoma, a disease her lawyers say caused her to miscarry.<br /> <br />More than 140 women have been charged under El Salvador's total ban on abortion since 1998, incarcerated for up to 35 years in some of the world's most notorious prisons. Like Manuela, many say they never had an abortion, but instead claim that after suffering a miscarriage they were wrongfully convicted when their doctors accused them of intentionally terminating their pregnancies.<br /> <br />At a moment when Roe v. Wade appears more vulnerable than ever to legal challenges, El Salvador provides a glimpse of what the United States could look like if bans on the procedure are permitted.</i><br /><br />Makes you think, doesn't it?<br /><br />Regards.<br />Ark<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Arkenatenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01166167852846589879noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5071813.post-57331056949277528462021-02-28T23:57:40.054-08:002021-02-28T23:57:40.054-08:00Based on your reply, David, it sounds like your vi...Based on your reply, David, it sounds like your view is more of an emotionally-driven opinion rather than a view based on thorough investigation.<br />Much like assuming that just because someone states they are Republican they must, therefore, automatically represent ''my values.''<br /><br /><br /><br />Just saying ...<br /><br />And my question regarding abortion? What do you believe should be government policy/law in this regard?Arkenatenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01166167852846589879noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5071813.post-3441738029536334092021-02-28T13:42:51.729-08:002021-02-28T13:42:51.729-08:00Ark: Most modern Republicans rather like Kennedy, ...Ark: Most modern Republicans rather like Kennedy, apart from his orgies. (And many, of course, envy him that.) Kennedy cut taxes and was strong on defense. I don't think he would have gone far in the modern Democratic Party. Bill Clinton might not, either. Even some of Obama's policies are becoming problematic. Things have changed a great deal. <br /><br />I appreciate your curiosity, but I'm not the one to offer detailed answers to those questions. You might look at the web site for a few powerful American politicians, to get a feel for their positions. Of course you can't always believe what you read on pages like that. David B Marshallhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04029133398946303654noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5071813.post-36611291349917543742021-02-28T02:24:09.910-08:002021-02-28T02:24:09.910-08:00My nationality is British.
the Democrats support ...<br />My nationality is British.<br /><br /><i>the Democrats support more government spending,</i><br /><br />What do you understand by the term 'government spending'? And spend on what, precisely?<br /><br /><i>abortion on demand,</i><br />As opposed to what? <br /><br /><i>relatively open borders,</i><br /> Seems a bit of a vague term. Can you be more precise. How does their policy differ from Republican policy on borders?<br /><br /><i>distaste for western civilization, what I regard as a neo-Marxist taste for group guilt,</i> <br />Seems an awful lot to unpack here and maybe a touch of rhetoric? Kennedy was Democrat and I would hardly call him or his policies demonstrating a ''distaste for western civilisation'' neo-Marxist by <i> any </i> stretch of the imagination.<br />Group guilt regarding what, exactly?<br /><br /><i>allowing children to decide if they are going to "transition" by cutting off primary or secondary sexual organs, </i> <br />I am not overly familiar with policy regarding transgender issues but what I have read of what's reported in the UK has some disturbing aspects, which I find disconcerting.<br /><br /> <i>They tend to favor extremely well-paid public education and public unions, which Republicans find ineffective and a positive impediment during the present pandemic.</i><br /><br />On this I am all at sea. I know almost nothing about union policies/politics. <br />Do you mean well-funded public education or well paid public education officials? <br /><br /><i>They also tend to support gun control, which I don't care MUCH about, but think they're wrong on, too. </i><br />Why do you think they are wrong? <br /><br /><i>Foreign policy is now confused. Republicans used to stand for stronger defense, but both parties are divided on this issue, now.</i><br />Are you specifically referring to military spending, or are you including other things? If so can you expand? <br />Arkenatenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01166167852846589879noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5071813.post-50393181519265740562021-02-27T19:22:22.322-08:002021-02-27T19:22:22.322-08:00Ark: What is your nationality?
I won't try ...Ark: What is your nationality? <br /><br />I won't try to be comprehensive. But generally speaking, the Democrats support more government spending, abortion on demand, and increasingly, relatively open borders, distaste for western civilization, what I regard as a neo-Marxist taste for group guilt, allowing children to decide if they are going to "transition" by cutting off primary or secondary sexual organs, etc. They tend to favor extremely well-paid public education and public unions, which Republicans find ineffective and a positive impediment during the present pandemic. <br /><br />They also tend to support gun control, which I don't care MUCH about, but think they're wrong on, too. They favor socialized medicine, against the present system, which however they created! (I tend to think the Japanese system would be a better model.) <br /><br />Foreign policy is now confused. Republicans used to stand for stronger defense, but both parties are divided on this issue, now. <br /><br />Maybe this is simplistic. Again, I'm not trying to be comprehensive or fair. And I know the international press tends to accept the American left's version of things. David B Marshallhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04029133398946303654noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5071813.post-75518635995221671702021-02-27T19:13:29.532-08:002021-02-27T19:13:29.532-08:00Gary: There is nothing wrong with peaceful protest...Gary: There is nothing wrong with peaceful protest. But very few evangelical pastors get that involved in politics at church, even if they have strong political beliefs. I have been to hundreds of churches, and almost never run across such activists. <br /><br />I don't really care if someone found an exception somewhere. America is a big country. <br /><br />As I told you, in fact, most evangelicals did NOT prefer Trump. Pew Research showed that during the primary, Republicans who did not attend religious services were more supportive of Trump than those that did: <br /><br />https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/07/21/churchgoing-republicans-once-skeptical-of-trump-now-support-him/<br /><br />And yes, given that right-wingers rioted just once, and left-wingers rioted for months, also that Republicans condemned those riots immediately, while Democrats denied, played down, and supported their own radicals for months, those of us who have been consistent (which is most Republicans) have every right in the world to call the Left on its utter hypocricy and the domestic terrorism it supported in 2020. David B Marshallhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04029133398946303654noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5071813.post-20811039774434673702021-02-27T04:34:31.183-08:002021-02-27T04:34:31.183-08:00@ David
But since I oppose everything the Democrat...@ David<br /><i>But since I oppose everything the Democratic Party stands for, ...</i><br /><br />As a non-American I find this whole republican/democrat thing fascinating. <br />Serious question; Without rhetoric or hyperbole could you simply explain exactly what the Democrat Party stand for? <br /><br />ThanksArkenatenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01166167852846589879noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5071813.post-44341259037021004812021-02-27T04:29:12.128-08:002021-02-27T04:29:12.128-08:00This comment has been removed by the author.Arkenatenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01166167852846589879noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5071813.post-40449775983232723482021-02-25T08:44:56.264-08:002021-02-25T08:44:56.264-08:00Many conservative evangelical pastors called on th...Many conservative evangelical pastors called on their congregations to march on the Capitol and to "fight" the "stolen election". Here is the evidence:<br /><br />https://lutherwasnotbornagaincom.wordpress.com/2021/01/31/evangelical-pastors-called-on-their-congregations-to-insurrect-against-the-united-states-of-america-on-january-6/<br /><br />Conservative evangelicals had many good candidates to choose from during the previous primary elections, but they stuck with Trump, the most immoral president in our history. Evangelical pastors could have called a summit at the beginning of the primary season and called on all evangelicals to abandon Trump because of his immorality and to back another conservative Republican. That did not happen.<br /><br />Evangelicals have no business lecturing liberals about morality and riots.Garyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02519721717265344702noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5071813.post-48702309839128105452021-02-24T20:59:42.269-08:002021-02-24T20:59:42.269-08:00I don't believe that's actually so. I'...I don't believe that's actually so. I've seen a study which showed that evangelical conservatives were LESS likely to support Trump than other conservatives. That jibes anecdotally: I know lots of people who voted for Trump, but hardly anyone who supported him early in the confirmation process. <br /> And I often hear concerns expressed, even by nominal supporters. But the converse is repeated, so everyone believes it. <br /><br />How many sincere conservative Christians rioted, or supported the rioting? I bet the true figure of the latter doesn't hit 5%.<br /><br />Anyway, it's ridiculous to think I have no right to complain about 6 months of left-wing rioting, which took dozens of lives directly, hundreds indirectly, cost a billion or two, and ravaged several cities probably in a long-term way, because a few of the rioters (how many? how do you know?) on one day last month were allegedly Christians. This reminds me of something Jesus said about the man with a beam in his eye, wanting to take the speck out of someone else's eye. Anyway, most Christians condemned both. David B Marshallhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04029133398946303654noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5071813.post-23173148601050005082021-02-24T17:23:19.038-08:002021-02-24T17:23:19.038-08:00The GOP has a plethora of good candidates (Christi...The GOP has a plethora of good candidates (Christie, Romney, Rubio, Bush, etc.), yet after four years of highly immoral behavior by Donald Trump, evangelicals clamored to re-elect him. The Capitol riot only occurred because evangelicals, Trump's core constituency, backed his false lies of voter fraud and stolen election. Evangelicals have no business lecturing liberals about immoral behavior or rioting.Garyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02519721717265344702noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5071813.post-65752350870351416002021-02-24T06:25:18.210-08:002021-02-24T06:25:18.210-08:00Gary: Fox News, against CNN, MSNBC, NBC, ABC and C...Gary: Fox News, against CNN, MSNBC, NBC, ABC and CBS? <br /><br />Conservatives may not be a small minority, but they definitely are a minority, as are liberals. Lots of people fall into some other category, including, I would say, Donald Trump. <br /><br />I wrote an ebook 5 years ago warning Christians against supporting Trump. But since I oppose everything the Democratic Party stands for, of course I couldn't vote for them, either. This election, after months worth of rioting by people on the Left, I did endorse Trump, in an article that was shared a few thousand times. Now I fervently hope he will go away, and am writing an article encouraging Trumpists to find a better person to represent their legitimate concerns. (Someone who will also care about the soaring National Debt, which I find horribly immoral.) <br /><br />David B Marshallhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04029133398946303654noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5071813.post-14133049013502607872021-02-23T21:58:27.811-08:002021-02-23T21:58:27.811-08:00The fact that Fox News is the most watched news ne...The fact that Fox News is the most watched news network in the country says a lot about our country. Conservatives are not some small persecuted minority. They constitute almost half of the American electorate. They almost won the last election, even though their candidate had been impeached twice, openly bragged about sexually assaulting women (grabbing their &$%#), and paid hush money to a porn star. So as your holy book says, take the beam out of your own eye before worrying about the splinter in your neighbor's eye. Yes, some liberals are too quick to pull out the race card, but shame on conservatives for supporting such a morally bankrupt presidential candidate.Garyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02519721717265344702noreply@blogger.com