Don't get me wrong, some of the books placed here do belong. But others emphatically do not, or probably on any reasonable Top-1000 list. And all kinds of books which are not merely good, but great, world-changing even, have been left out.
One of the biggest problems with this list is its over-abundance of second-rate American novels. (Mind you, I didn't say third rate!) While American myself, I have a hard time believing any American piece of literature yet produced belongs above any of Charles Dicken's five or ten best novels, for instance, let alone the best of Shakespeare or Tolstoy. Yet not one single Dickens appears on the list at all.
Here's the list. It'll be easier to explain which books do NOT belong on it (at least, among those I have read!), than remember which do. But I'll attempt both.
What needs to go: All the Hemingway and Phillip Pullman books. They're mildly entertaining and moderately interesting, and Pullman evokes thoughts of some kind or other, but he's ignorant of history as a clam is of geothermals. Chairman Mao -- good heavens, how did that savage get in there? Some of his poems are original enough, but let's just set a rule that literature from people who don't mind killing tens of millions of their countrymen is defective in some way. The same with Karl Marx: he's OK as a writer, but a mere educated cultist as a thinker. The Lion the Witch, and the Wardrobe? We can find something better from Lewis than that. I haven't read Galbraith or that Freud, but I'm skeptical. 1984 is important, but not that important -- down to 70 or so. Get rid of Lolita, because pedophilia isn't something to teach kids, sorry. 100 Years of Solitude is over-rated. Rousseau (probably), The Prince (maybe), Leviathan, Charlottes' Web (what's that book doing in that sentence?) Also Silent Spring (probably), Slaughterhouse 5 (definitely), Invisible Man, Gone With the Wind, Catcher in the Rye, Catch-22, Great Gatsby (not that great -- a weak copy-cat pseudo-Victorian novel of manners) and probably Virginia Wolf. This is supposed to be a book of great literature, not a record of how American high school teachers abuse their lit students. "Goodbye to All That!" (94) And Keynes, too, since he was wrong -- substitute Adam Smith.
And sorry, Bears of Very Little Brain have a hard time making the top-100 list -- though I'll keep Pooh in mind.
And sorry, Bears of Very Little Brain have a hard time making the top-100 list -- though I'll keep Pooh in mind.
What can stay: War and Peace, Iliad, Odyssey, Pride and Prejudice, Divine Comedy, Canterbury Tales, Gulliver, Brave New World (lower), Democracy in America, Origin of Species, Herodotus, Confessions, Night, Varieties of Religious Experience, Lord Jim (maybe), Heart of Darkness, Wind in the Willows (maybe), Huck Finn, Malcolm X. (See! I'm not that prejudiced against American writers!)
What needs to be added:
The Bible first, of course: placing it 41, after To Kill a Mockingbird, a touching novel by a precocious young woman, looks like a calculated insult.
Analects of Confucius.
Dao De Jing
Tang poems. (Mao over that? Are you crazy?)
Journey to the West.
Bhagavad Gita.
Bacchae (Euripides)
Medea (Euripides)
The Frogs
Prometheus Bound
The Campaigns of Alexander (Arrian)
City of God
Poetic Edda
Dream of the Rood
Brothers Karamazov (someone thought Catch-22 more deserving than this?)
First Circle (Solzhenitsyn).
One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich
Gulag Archipelago
Resurrection. (Tolstoy)
Great Expectations (Dickens)
Tale of Two Cities
Christmas Carol
Nickolas Nicklesby
Wealth of Nations
Reflections on the Revolution in France
Orthodoxy (Chesterton)
The Everlasting Man
Perelandra (C. S. Lewis)
Surprised by Joy
Till We Have Faces
The Last Battle
From Pagan to Christian (Lin Yutang)
Imperial Peking: Seven Centuries of China
The Kite Runner
For the Glory of God (Stark)
Lost in the Cosmos (Percy)
Les Miserables (if there's room)
Peace Child (Richardson)
Life of Johnson
Harry Potter?
10 comments:
David, the Bible is already on the list: number 41.
OK. Well, I'll put it at the top, then. War and Peace is great, but even Tolstoy recognized he had a long way to go to catch up to the Sermon on the Mount. He cut out the miracles in his NT, like Jefferson, but that only demonstrates the partiality of his own experience.
I have no argument at all with that.
Any list of the Top 100 Books that does not include T.S. Eliot's Four Quartets is not worthy of the name. Vikram Seth's A Suitable Boy ought to at least be considered, along with the libretto to Wagner's Ring Operas. I don't think I saw Malory's Le Morte D'Arthur anywhere on that list, but again, it simply must be on there. I would keep C.S. Lewis, but replace his Narnia books with his Deep Heaven Trilogy. And speaking of fantasy/science fiction, Walter M. Miller's A Canticle For Liebowitz is surely destined to grow and grow in recognition as the years pass. Put him on the list!
I like A Canticle For Liebowitz, and That Hideous Strength, but couldn't see them that high -- Peralandra is on my list, you'll notice. I suppose I could substitute the trilogy for the one. Have only read individual poems or an essay or two from Eliot, and have never heard of Vikram Seth. Thanks for the suggestions.
Vikram Seth is an Indian writer who writes in English. His doorstop of a novel, A Suitable Boy, manages to span the gamut of post-independence India in a single volume. The plot revolves around a family's resolve to find "a suitable boy" for their eligible daughter to marry. In the process, we are treated to an amazing panoramic tour of quite literally every aspect of Indian society - its history, its hopes and aspirations, its contradictions and shortcomings, the uneasy coexistence of Hindu and Muslim, tradition and modernity, family and nation. I've never read a book quite like it. Yes, it is Indian to its core, but it somehow manages to attain to universality in its outlook.
At 1474 pages, it might seem a bit daunting. But let me assure you, when I finished it, I (literally) cried because it wasn't longer. I didn't want it to end.
Geez David. This list is like asking which is your favourite child. Why 3 books by Solzhenitsyn? Ivan Denisovich was the best of them all. And where was William Golding? I think any Evangelical in a building program (Mark Driscoll, Gospel For Asia) should have to read "The Spire". And any established church should have to read "The Lord of the Flies". And yes, keep "The Lion..." by Lewis. And if there is any truth about the nature of being a man, it is in Hemmingway's "The Short Happy Life of Francis M...". Bam!!!
"Also Silent Spring (probably)" Only "probably" for a piece of fiction masquerading as scientific fact. A book that set the "environmental" movement on it's present course of power over truth.
MC: Your second full sentence answers the challenge in the third. I found First Circle far and away Solzhenitsyn's best. Lord of the Flies would be a worthy alternative, perhaps. Haven't read that Hemmingway, though I have given him several other chances, thanks also for the suggestion.
Bill: I shall keep this spring silent by not allowing Rachel Carton to disturb its peace.
Post a Comment