I just posted the following critical review of philosopher A. C. Grayling's new book, The God Argument: The Case Against Religion and for Humanism, on Amazon. Judging by blowback to date for critical comments of Grayling there, despite Grayling's talk about listening carefully and living with magnanimity, I don't expect too much love from this admittedly harsh (but detailed) review. We'll see if anyone addresses my arguments. I will probably also focus on specific claims Grayling makes (or assumes) in later posts. (See here for my initial impressions, which turned out to be precient. Although Grayling does define "religion," his definition does indeed turn out tendendious.)
If you like or dislike the review, feel free to express your thoughts here, or on Amazon, where voting gives other readers a chance to see a useful review, or you can consign one soundly to the rubbish bin of history.
(For a more sympathetic critical review, read what Keith Ward makes of this "bad argument.")
